Skip to main content

Defining Relevant Markets for Mergers and Acquisitions Involving Communications Services

Harold Furchtgott-Roth

Over the past twenty years, the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice have reviewed many mergers in the communications sector. Without quantitative analyses, the federal agencies have consistently defined unchanging separate relevant markets for wireline and wireless services for antitrust reviews. The agencies have incentives not to change relevant market definitions, although both new technologies and aggregate data likely support new relevant market definitions. A contemporary relevant market definition may include both wireline and wireless services.

View PDF

Related Articles

Net Neutrality: Is Antitrust Law More Effective than Regulation in Protecting Consumers and Innovation?

Robert M. McDowell

Click below to read Commissioner Robert M. McDowell's testimony before the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform, Co...

View PDF

Net Neutrality and Antitrust Law

Robert M. McDowell

Witnesses testified at a House Judiciary subcommittee hearing on net neutrality and antitrust law....

Continue Reading

"First Sale" Doctrine Should Not Become Pretext for Virtual Piracy

Harold Furchtgott-Roth

On June 2, the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property and the Internet of the House Judiciary Committee held a hearing in New York City on the ...

Continue Reading