Skip to main content

Defining Relevant Markets for Mergers and Acquisitions Involving Communications Services

Harold Furchtgott-Roth & Jeffrey Li

Over the past twenty years, the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice have reviewed many mergers in the communications sector. Without quantitative analyses, the federal agencies have consistently defined unchanging separate relevant markets for wireline and wireless services for antitrust reviews. The agencies have incentives not to change relevant market definitions, although both new technologies and aggregate data likely support new relevant market definitions. A contemporary relevant market definition may include both wireline and wireless services.

View PDF

Related Articles

Hudson Institute Releases Study on the Worth of the Internet to the U.S. Economy

On September 8 at 12pm, Hudson Institute's Center for the Economics of the Internet will host a seminar launching a new report on the economic growth ...

Continue Reading

Net Neutrality Vs. Free Speech

Robert M. McDowell

As the Federal Communications Commission's Sept. 15 deadline for public comment on its new net-neutrality rules approaches, the "open Internet" moveme...

Continue Reading

Communicators on Media Mergers

Robert M. McDowell

Michael Copps and Robert McDowell talked about media merger proposals, including the proposed AT&T-DirecTV merger and the proposed Comcast-Time Warner...

Watch Now