SVG
Commentary
Wall Street Journal

The End of Chevron Deference Could Be Good for Free Trade

Thanks to a Loper Bright v. Raimondo, Congress now has an extra tool to combat protectionism.

An image of the US Supreme Court on July 30, 2024, in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch via Getty Images)
Caption
An image of the US Supreme Court on July 30, 2024, in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch via Getty Images)

Voters deserve to know how Donald Trump and Kamala Harris intend to fix the global trade system. Its crowning achievements—the Bretton Woods monetary management system and the World Trade Organization—are in disrepair. China has ignored the rules of the road, and the U.S. has embraced tariffs and industrial policy. Each action has undermined the postwar economic order.

Yet thanks to the Supreme Court, lawmakers now have an extra tool to combat ineffective and often-counterproductive trade policy. In Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024) the high court overturned Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984), which instructed judges to defer to agency interpretations of vague laws as long as they were “reasonable.” Loper Bright gives Congress—which has constitutional authority over trade policy—the power to temper the unilateral trade actions of the executive branch.

Read the full article in The Wall Street Journal.

Enjoyed this article? Subscribe to Hudson’s newsletters to stay up to date with our latest content.